<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: George Turnour’s edition of the Mahavansa</title> <atom:link href="http://mahavamsa.org/2008/05/introduction-george-turnour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://mahavamsa.org/2008/05/introduction-george-turnour/</link> <description>The Great Chronicle of Sri Lanka</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <item><title>By: D Jayakody</title><link>http://mahavamsa.org/2008/05/introduction-george-turnour/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link> <dc:creator>D Jayakody</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:32:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mahavamsa.org/?p=466#comment-262</guid> <description>It is about time that this article is re-published on the main Amarasara website. With the treacherous policies of Ranil Wickramasingha government teaching of Sri Lankan history was abandoned in our National schools; this allowed the terrorists and thie intellectual supporters to re-write their version of Sri Lankan history placing claims for the ownership of the Island to Tamil marauders. The end result is a hotch potch of ideas that corrupted the brains and thinking of our younger generations, and of course of the &quot;Colombians&quot; that ape the western ways.This article orginally written by a western traveller and scholar is beneficial to start straigtening the record.  I very much urge the editor to consider publishing this item on the main website amongst news items.One point I would like to make however.  I understand that Sanskrit was the root language of both Pali and then Sinhala. The article says that Pali was the root of Sanskrit, and I think it is wrong.  May be the editor ought to correct this error, otherwise the credibility of the article could be questioned by the one&#039;s who is against the main message and just wish to split hair for the sake of it.Kind regardsDhanapala Jayakody</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is about time that this article is re-published on the main Amarasara website. With the treacherous policies of Ranil Wickramasingha government teaching of Sri Lankan history was abandoned in our National schools; this allowed the terrorists and thie intellectual supporters to re-write their version of Sri Lankan history placing claims for the ownership of the Island to Tamil marauders. The end result is a hotch potch of ideas that corrupted the brains and thinking of our younger generations, and of course of the &#8220;Colombians&#8221; that ape the western ways.</p><p>This article orginally written by a western traveller and scholar is beneficial to start straigtening the record.  I very much urge the editor to consider publishing this item on the main website amongst news items.</p><p>One point I would like to make however.  I understand that Sanskrit was the root language of both Pali and then Sinhala. The article says that Pali was the root of Sanskrit, and I think it is wrong.  May be the editor ought to correct this error, otherwise the credibility of the article could be questioned by the one&#8217;s who is against the main message and just wish to split hair for the sake of it.</p><p>Kind regards</p><p>Dhanapala Jayakody</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>